Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  159 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 159 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Vico’s Ring

159

presentation of

Ethics

– marking it as a work of rare genius per-

haps more so than any other aspect – can also be seen in a dif-

ferent light, namely, intended as a way of presenting the logic of

his system without recourse to language. The operative term here

is «intended», so the issue at this time is not whether the objec-

tive was actually achieved or even achievable. Spinoza himself

made a distinction between Euclid’s writings on geometry, and

language:

Euclid, whose writings are concerned only with things exceedingly

simple and perfectly intelligible, is easily made clear by anyone in any

language, for in order to grasp his thought and to be assured of his

true meaning there is no need to have a thorough knowledge of the

language in which he wrote. A superficial and rudimentary knowledge

is enough

374

.

Euclid’s

Elements

, of course, consists of text and diagrams,

and so it is significant that Spinoza de-emphasizes, not the dia-

grams, but the text as such, and with it language, such that even

minimal knowledge of Greek, or any language, by extension,

would suffice to grasp the «true meaning». Taken to its logical

conclusion, the need for language, and its value, becomes vanish-

ingly small, and in the limit, tends to zero

375

. Euclid’s proposi-

tional/logical apparatus («things exceedingly simple and perfectly

intelligible») is thus taken to be categorically different from lan-

guage, and not subject to or dependent on language

376

. Viewed in

relation to this epistemological paradigm, the internal organiza-

tion of

Ethics

takes on special meaning: its Euclidean “format”

377

is a claim to communicating the second and third kinds of

knowledge in the only way commensurate with true philosophy,

that is, outside language

378

. If this interpretation is correct, it

adresses the problematic aspects in the opposing views outlined

above. First of all, Spinoza’s explicit relegation of language to the

first kind of knowledge with all its limitations and inadequacies is

upheld; whatever inconsistencies are present in

Ethics

, they are