Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  161 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 161 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Vico’s Ring

161

dium; to the contrary, they convey the notion of mastery and

control over language, over the relation of language to the world,

and ultimately, even the ability of varying this relation as well as

alternativeness relation over “worlds”

382

. As noted above, these

are the hallmarks of language as “calculus” in our sense.

For additional evidence in ascertaining Vico’s presuppostions,

we turn to Chapter IV of “Poetic Logic”, in particular, §§ 437-

446, where Vico presents his thesis of «three languages» which

he closely associates to three paradigmatic successive historical

“ages” (the ages of the “gods”, of “heroes”, and of “men”)

383

.

The first language rules in the realm of the sacred; the second,

prevails in the world of «heroic», that is, «aristocratically» ruled,

and ideologically driven, communities, whereas the third lan-

guage is the language of intellectual reflection as well as the vehi-

cle of intersubjectivity in the more «human(e)» forms of govern-

ance of «populist republics» and «monarchies». In view of Vico’s

sharply drawn lines between these three types of languages, his

clarification in § 446 is key to solving the diachronic/functional

puzzle:

To enter now upon the extremely difficult [question of the] way in

which these three kinds of languages and letters were formed, we must

establish this principle: that as gods, heroes, and men began at the

same time (for they were, after all, men who imagined the gods and be-

lieved their own heroic nature to be a mixture of the divine and human

natures), so these three languages began at the same time, each having

its letters, which developed along with it.

As explained by Zagarella, taking Vico at his (above) word,

the three types of languages, while always present, and present

from the beginning, are extant in different proportions during

different times (ages); these greatly varying proportions give a

distinctive character to each age

384

. Furthermore, in each age, el-

ements or traces of the other languages are never completely

eliminated or cancelled out

385

. This is true as much for the first,