Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  69 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 69 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Vico’s Ring

69

sociated with intersubjectivity, and social relations. Against this

“gold standard” of human nature, Vico then holds up the

changed situation «when nature was corrupted by fall of Adam»

and «man lost [..] the pure mind» (Chapter 4, §§ 7-12). It is at this

juncture that Vico introduces the dichotomy of

true

and

certain

, to

wit: «But when man lost through sin the pure mind by which he

had knowledge of truth in conducting his life, the

certain

had to

be substituted for the

true

» (italics added). While it may need no

further explanation as to what Vico meant by

true

in view of his

foregoing account of «unfallen nature», the introduction of the

new term «certain» requires clarification, and Vico provides clari-

fication of sorts immediately: «

Certain

gods,

certain

ceremonies,

certain

verbal formulas were instituted by laws so that the religion

might be as eternal as humanly possible» (italics added). Set

against the standard of truth that Vico had earlier established, by

stating, for example, that «God alone is true and truth itself»

(Chapter 4, § 1), the

certain

falls short of that standard, but is the

next best thing

132

. It gives structure to human society, and ideally

a significant measure of stability and permanence. This passage is

also noteworthy for the fact that it is at this point in

Philosophy

that Vico associates (positive) law with the

certain

133

. But the con-

cept of

certain

in this context mainly serves to cast the

true

into

relief as the proper subject and substance of “philosophy”,

whereas the

certain

belongs to the sphere of “philology”.

Having established the platform, Vico delineates

134

his notions

of human nature and the human mind, free will, and the human

actions by relatively extensive engagement, and polemics, with

classical philosophical currents that he associates with, or attrib-

utes to, Platonism, the Stoics, Epicurus, and Aristotle (Chapters

5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19). He finds common ground with

Plato especially in the recognition that «there is the class of

things beyond the body and thus eternal which are not perceived

by the senses but the intellect, or the doctrine of ideas, insofar as

ideas bring eternal truths to the mind», and that «the human