Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  191 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 191 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Vico’s Ring

191

Notes to Chapter 8

392

As stated before, we are always referring to the 1744 edition, and will

specifically identify the 1725 and 1730 editions as such.

393

As a matter of fact, B. A. Haddock felt this way: «the “discovery of the

true Homer” […] is best regarded as an appendix to the theses advanced in

[Book II]» (Id.,

Vico’s “Discovery of the True Homer”: A Case-Study in Historical

Reconstruction

, in «Journal of the History of Ideas», 40, 1979, 4, pp. 583-602, p.

588).

394

Papini, while not advocating the same kind of ring structure presented

here, places Book III at the center of a diagram of the work’s five “books”,

explaining: «[…] cioè il

Libro terzo

rappresenta non un’appendice del

Libro se-

condo

dedicato all’età degli eroi, ma il punto centrale o asse portante di tutto il

sistema speculativo vichiano ([…] namely,

Book III

constitutes, not an appen-

dix to

Book II

devoted to the age of the heroes, but the central point or the

underpinning of Vico’s entire speculative system)» (Id.,

Il geroglifico della storia

,

cit., p. 312).

395

The following are a few of the more significant references, based on

The First New Science,

ed. and trans. by L. Pompa, Cambridge-New York,

Cambridge University Press, 2000, including paragraph numbering (which fol-

lows F. Nicolini’s system of numbered paragraphs, see

ibid.

, p. XLVI), namely:

Book I, Chapter X, § 34; Book II, Chapter LII [LIII], § 203; Chapter LV

[LVII], § 207; Chapter LX [LXI], § 221; Chapter LXIII [LXIV], §§ 236, 240;

Book III, Chapter XIII, § 275; Chapter XIV, § 277; Chapter XV, §§ 282, 284;

Chapter XVII [XVIII], § 288; Chapter XVIII [XIX], § 293; Chapter XX

[XXI], §§ 295-297; Chapter XXV [XXVI], §§ 311, 312; Chapter XXVI

[XXVII], §§ 313-315.

396

P

. Cristofolini summed up the contrast between the two editions:

«Nella

Scienza nuova prima

,

come i lettori di Vico sanno, la

Discoverta del vero

Omero

non c’è. Quello che nelle due successive versioni sarà il terzo libro, bre-

ve, centrale, quasi nel posto del cuore, qui non si trova nemmeno in forma di

capitoletto o paragrafo, l’espressione stessa,

discoverta

ecc.

, che Vico ripeterà con

tanta fierezza nel corso degli anni più tardi, non si è ancora affacciata. […] Ma

questi elementi non fanno corpo unitario né confluiscono nel riconoscimento

del carattere universale dell’autore dell’

Iliade

e dell’

Odissea

; questo accadrà solo

a partire dal 1730 (In the

First New Science

, as readers of Vico know, there is no

Discovery of the True Homer.

The material that will in the two subsequent ver-

sions become the third, short, central book, in effect placed at the heart of it,

cannot be found here even in the form of a short chapter or paragraph; the

expression

Discovery etc.

itself that Vico will repeat with such pride during later

years, is not yet introduced. […] But these elements do not make up a unified