Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  190 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 190 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Horst Steinke

190

has befallen the poems of Homer as the Law of the Twelve Ta-

bles») (§ 904)

404

.

As has been observed earlier, viewed on the broader canvas

of the development of Roman civilization

de longue durée

as a

model for Vico of the development of human civilization in gen-

eral, Homer assumes a larger privotal role and function, namely,

that of being a unique record of the (lost) world of humans, so-

cially, “politically”, of the worldview, the mindset, the language,

and the behavioral pattern(s) prevalent in archaic times. Having

devoted the bulk of

Scienza nuova

to “Poetic Wisdom”, his theory

of origins, Vico now in Book III lays out his methodology by

which he arrived at the reconstruction of primordial culture

405

.

He scrutinizes the language, personalities, manners and customs

depicted in the

Iliad

and

Odyssey

, and realizes that their character-

istics cannot but have originated in the distant past of the Greek

people, going so far as asserting that the

Iliad

account depicted a

time and

milieu

that was very different from the world in the pag-

es of the

Odyssey

406

.

These perceived differences lead him to “dis-

cover” in the

Iliad

the earliest stratum

407

of Greek civilization

408

.

And he was proving that it was possible to find a way of access-

ing the archaic world, the ages of “gods” and “heroes”, which is

an essential condition of possibility of deciphering “Poetic Wis-

dom”.

Rather than engaging in a further (narrative) description of

Vico’s hermeneutical approach in Book III, its contours may be

drawn more distinctly by positing it again in relation to Spinoza’s

thought, all the more so as Spinoza did have his own theory of

interpretation which he propounded explicitly and directly in

TTP

. As was the case in different contexts in previous parts of

this work, our focus on Vico’s thought necessarily places con-

straints on the breadth and depth of Spinoza’s body of thought

being considered.