Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  281 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 281 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Vico’s Ring

281

wording his own writings (M. Lollini,

Il mito come precomprensione storica aperta

nella Scienza nuova di Giambattista Vico

, in «BCSV», XXVI-XXVII, 1996-1997,

pp. 29-53, p. 39; G. Nencioni,

Corso e ricorso linguistico nella Scienza nuova

, in

«BCSV», XIV-XV, 1984-1985, pp. 39-62; and especially Vico’s

Correzioni,

miglioramenti e aggiunte

(corrections, refinements, and additions) in turning the

1730 edition into the final 1744 edition of

Scienza nuova

, for which see G. Vi-

co,

La Scienza nuova. Le tre edizioni,

cit., p. 777).

567

Summarizing his observations in §§ 792-803, Chapter III on “The Age

of Homer”. E. H. Cline refers to various putative anachronisms on the basis

of current historical/archaeological knowledge: cremation rather than burial;

the characteristics of chariots and fighting tactics; individual duel and method

of marching; weapons and other artifacts (Id.,

The Trojan War: A Very Short

Introduction

, Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 45-49).

568

In Nuzzo’s words: «La scienza della storia può essere data perché quella

storia ha un “ordine” che può essere ricostruito […] con una “concatenata

serie di ragioni”, e l’ “interpretare”, l’esercizio ermeneutico esercitato anche

sui tempi più distanti e favolosi, può essere ricondotto e fondato ad un ordine

di necessità logiche […]» (Historical knowledge can be obtained since history

has an “order” that can be reconstructed […] with an “interconnected series

of explanations”, and the process of “interpretation”, the hermeneutical prac-

tice applied also to very distant and legendary times, can be attributed to, and

founded on, an order of logical necessity […])» (Id.,

Tra ordine della storia e sto-

ricità

, cit., p. 101).

569

See J. Bennet: «[…] we can go some way to explaining how some fea-

tures of the material world of the Bronze Age were preserved in Homeric po-

etry, while, […] social features – and many linguistic features – were systemat-

ically and subconsciously modernized through time» (Id.,

Homer and the Bronze

Age

, cit., p. 531); similarly, E. H. Cline: «Overall, the

Iliad

seems to be a com-

pilation of details and data spanning the full range of time from the Bronze

Age to the Iron Age. This may be expected, if changes and updates were con-

stantly being made to the poem as it was handed down over the centuries, in

order to keep it fresh and relevant». Cline’s view of underlying “historicality”

vs. pure “fictionality” characterizes the evidence as «uncertain» and “equivo-

cal”, however, does not dismiss it out of hand, for example, «whether the

Greek poems are a reflection of what seems to have been more than several

hundred years of on-again, off-again conflict between the Hittites and the

Ahhiyawans (Mycenaeans) – a telescoping of numerous events into a series of

epic poems about the “war to end all wars”. […] The lines between reality and

fantasy might be blurred, particularly when Zeus, Hera, and other gods be-

come involved in the war. And we might quibble about some of the details,