@article {1949160,
	title = {Deleuze e Freud. Note per uno studio sulla {\textquotedblleft}Logica del senso{\textquotedblright}},
	journal = {Laboratorio dell{\textquoteright}ISPF},
	volume = {X},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {4.3},
	abstract = {Deleuze and Freud. Notes for a study on {\textquotedblleft}The Logic of Sense{\textquotedblright}. Can we claim that Deleuze is tacitly indebted to Freud and Freudiansm? This essay suggests that Deleuze experienced a double misunderstanding of the father of psychoanalysis. This could be ascribed to the misrecognition of the intrinsic affinities between the critical intention of Deleuze and Guattari and the materialism and anti-cartesianism that informed the Freudian program, and to the unexpected convergences with the latter. Such convergences can be traced in some passages of The Logic of Sense, through the mediation of the Kleinian lesson and the introduction of the concept of phantom {\textendash} element which sublimates the libidinal energy and the erotic investment; or through dynamic homologies and structural ones with the classical psychoanalytical approach. Thus, Freud could be part of a hidden genealogy of Deleuze{\textquoteright}s thought.},
	issn = {1824-9817},
	doi = {10.12862/ispf13L404},
	url = {http://www.dx.doi.org/10.12862/ispf13L404},
	author = {Fabio D. Palumbo}
}
